Waljee Lab
freepik_2148816448
Lab Director
Dr. Akbar Waljee, MD, MSc See Profile
Research Interests

 

  • Development of prediction models using novel machine learning algorithms to risk stratify and individualize care among patients with high-expense, low-prevalence diseases.
  • Develop, evaluate, and implement decision support systems for physicians.
  • Evaluate medical and surgical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.
Using Prediction Tools

Predictive modeling includes both traditional “regression” models and novel “machine learning” approaches. Regression models are usually used to identify associations and causal pathways by testing specific hypotheses, an approach best suited to the examination of a limited number of variables with high data quality. In contrast, machine learning models can identify predictive patterns under the sole hypothesis that some predictive pattern exists, a technique intended to make sense of information on a large number of variables even when the source data are quite “dirty”. These models have not been widely applied in medicine, but are commonly used in other fields. For example, economic and marketing strategists use machine learning based approaches to analyzing large amounts of data, detecting patterns, and taking action on these patterns to understand consumer-spending behavior. The banking industry extends very specific credit card offers based on a person’s spending history, online advertisements after mining a person’s browsing history, and some companies recommend books based on previous purchases. It remains unclear whether traditional regression or machine learning models are more effective in evaluating patient risk and estimating response to therapy and my research focus is directed at providing a model for developing such tools for high-expenditure, low prevalence (HELP) conditions, using IBD as a model disease.

Background
Waljee Research Image

Here is a description of the key components:

Individual Characteristics (Left Panel):

Includes information specific to a patient, such as demographics, laboratory results, and treatment history.

Depicted as a collection of individual icons and a box labeled with "DEMOGRAPHICS," "LABS," and "TREATMENTS."

Traffic Light Visualization (Middle Panel):

A symbolic representation, likely indicating risk levels or treatment urgency.

The traffic light contains three signals: red (high risk or stop), yellow (moderate risk or caution), and green (low risk or go).

Clinical Decision (Right Panel):

Focused on providing individualized, targeted treatment options based on patient-specific data.

The box is labeled "Individualized Targeted Treatment Options," indicating that decisions are tailored to each patient's unique characteristics.

Decision Aids (Far-Right Panel):

Highlights the use of decision aids to assist in the process of shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.

These aids may help interpret the information or make decisions based on the risk levels visualized.

The infographic conveys the integration of individual patient data with decision-making tools to optimize personalized healthcare outcomes.

Patients with “High Expense, Low Prevalence” (HELP) diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and inflammatory bowel disease are at risk for exacerbations (flares), disease complications and treatment related side effects that can result in preventable mortality or major morbidity. Millions of dollars are spent yearly on medications for HELP diseases. Although some of these patients require lifelong, expensive, and potentially harmful medications to prevent serious complications, many others are at lower risk and are best treated with less expensive and less harmful medications, or by using “as-needed” therapy as flares occur.

Such complexities in patient circumstances and decision-making are very common in medical practice and therefore, risk-stratifying patients with HELP diseases for a disease exacerbation offers great promise to significantly improve both the quality and efficiency of patient care. Tools that more accurately predict the course of disease and offer advice on appropriate treatment could substantially improve the decision-making process. Developing tools and decision support systems to guide clinicians in personalizing medical decision-making for patients with HELP diseases is of particular importance in our modern, data-intensive and computing-intensive world, far more data is collected than can be fully evaluated by even expert healthcare providers. However, to implement this “targeted” or “tailored” prevention approach to risk stratifying individuals for disease exacerbation and treatment, a clinician must know both the individual’s baseline risk of disease complications and the probability that the individual would benefit (or suffer harm) from therapy. Having risk stratification tools developed and validated is an important first step towards realizing efficient patient-centered care for HELP diseases.

My research goals are to develop “targeted-prevention” prediction tools and decision support systems to facilitate the delivery of timely and cost-effective therapy for HELP with a focus on Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) as a model condition for HELP diseases.

Waljee Research Image 2

Graphic showing predictive modeling

This infographic compares two models of care: Usual Care (Symptom-Driven Care) and a Proposed Model (Risk Stratification, Targeted Therapy Model). Here's a detailed breakdown:

A. Usual Care: Symptom-Driven Care

Symptoms (Input):
Care begins when a patient presents symptoms.
Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM):
Treatment is guided by general population-based guidelines.
Specialist-Driven Treatment:
Patients receive symptom-focused treatment by specialists.

Outcomes:
Clinical and economic results are evaluated after symptom-driven interventions.

B. Proposed Model: Risk Stratification, Targeted Therapy Model

This model follows a structured approach to proactive, individualized care:

1. Antecedents (Pre-Symptomatic Phase)

Patient Data:
Incorporates biological and physiological variables (e.g., age, ESR, CRP).
Risk Stratification Process:
Patient data undergoes preparation, validation, and modeling to stratify risk levels.

2. Structure

Data Modeling:
Patient data is analyzed for individualized risk profiles, enabling proactive decision-making.

3. Process (Clinical Decision)

Individualized Decisions:
Treatment is tailored by primary care providers (PCPs) or specialists based on the stratified risk data.

4. Outcome (Monitoring and Testing)

Outcome Tracking:
Ongoing monitoring of clinical and economic outcomes, focusing on the prevention or management of clinical flares.

5. UTAUT (System Change and Implementation)*

Organizational Evaluation:
The model's implementation is evaluated for effectiveness and integrated into system-wide care practices.

Key Aims of the Proposed Model
Aim 1: Develop and validate the risk stratification process.
Aim 2: Monitor clinical and economic outcomes to reduce clinical flares.
Aim 3: Facilitate organizational change and evaluate the integration of the model into healthcare systems.

This infographic highlights the shift from reactive, symptom-driven care to a proactive, data-driven, individualized approach for improved healthcare outcomes.